Here are the Top 4 Cross-Chains Solutions to look at in 2022


&nbsp &nbsp

One of the major problems facing cryptocurrencies today is the difficulty of exchanging / changing tokens across different systems. To be precise, all the money available in the market today cannot be exchanged for another. This is because there are few bridges that connect to different ecosystems and if they are only supporters of a fixed number of assets.

And while there are some projects that consider their own interoperability solutions, most of the most popular bridges today impose many limitations that make the process described above very difficult. For example, Binance Bridge displays a fixed number of operations per hour and some other similar solutions only support certain signal types (e.g. ERC-20, BEP, etc.). . Another problem is that investors are required to complete two or more projects before they can transfer their money to the ecosystem of their choice – all after payment. to hefty fees and commission -related fees at every step of the way.

However, as the industry continues to grow, there are now options on the market that can help alleviate these problems. In this article, we will list some of the best cross-chain solutions available today. So, without a bit, let’s jump right into the heart of the matter.

Centrifuge Connectors

The Centrifuge ‘Connectors’ bridge is designed to bridge the current gap between the real estate market (RWA) and decentralized finance (DeFi).

The additives practice the transfer of certification signals and are allowed in its natural water pond to those working on different chains. It accomplishes this by using its smart Solidity -related agreements that can be deployed on a variety of EVM bridges. In addition, cryptocurrencies can enable users to return / transfer their money into multiple currency pools using the real stablecoin of the target chain.


&nbsp &nbsp

Lastly, the platform is said to have been established in partnership with Ava Labs – the parent body that oversees the operations of the ‘Avalanche’ blockchain system – Moonbeam’s smart contract ecosystem, with a good idea of ​​how interoperability protocol Nomad.


DeBridge is well defined as an offering that enables cross-chain interoperability and value-added. It allows users to create cryptocurrency transactions and exchange information between different protocols with ease while being used by a network of independent advisors / validators.

From a practical point of view, it should be noted that all cross-chain changes can be completed via DeBridge in less than 60 seconds. Finally, the platform currently supports a total of five blockchains, namely Polygon, Binance SmartChain, Ethereum, Arbitrum, Heco.

Celer cCbridge

As the name suggests, cBridge is a crypto interoperability solution developed by Celer Network. The platform is built on multiple chains and is designed to allow users to customize individual, low -cost, instantaneous transactions. However, what really sets cBridge apart from its competitors is the combination of support for multi-1 blockchains (i.e. Polkadot, Ethereum), which works well. with many layer-2 effects including ZK Rollups, sidechains (like Skale, Matic, etc.), Optimistic Rollups, etc.

Technically, cBridge provides pure support for various EVM blockchains – including Avalanche and Phantom – for the purpose of chain switching. The interest rates on the threshold are between 0.04% and 0.1%.


As it stands now, RenBridge is designed to help streamline non -financial relationships (financial and otherwise) between different systems such as Binance Smart Chain, Avalanche, Solana, Arbitrum. , Phantom, Avalanche, and Polygon. The platform allows users to set up currency pairs to convert them into Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, and Zcash.

RenBridge charges a variety of fees – including 0.15% for fire -related procedures and an additional 0.15% for each token minting transaction. Lastly, users are required to pay a small fee to pay miners working on its affiliate blockchains. The cost for this is calculated in real time based on factors such as network congestion, macroeconomic conditions, etc.

Leave a Comment